Code, Camera, Action

Stories, software and strategies to help nonprofits do web 2.0+ 
« Back to blog

Post: Kiva Is Not Quite What It Seems

David Roodman's long post is a great explanation of how Kiva works. It's also critical of the way Kiva markets.

Here's the issue. Let's say you make a $25 loan on kiva.org. You pick an entrepreneur, you make a loan. The web site makes it look like you have funded that particular entrepreneur. But that isn't really how the microfinance organization works. For practical reasons, that entrepreneur has already been funded by one of Kiva's partners on the ground. On one level, Kiva is open about this, providing dates of loans and so forth -- though its marketing simplifies these details. The post is well worth reading if, like me, you're a fan of Kiva or of microfinance generally.

There's a bigger issue here between the stories that motivate donors and poverty in the developing world. Do donor stories help fight poverty -- or do they put drag on the efficiency of the fight? 

Kiva brings microcredit and microchips to child sponsorship. Like sponsorship charities, it is all about stories: it was inspired by them and it succeeds by telling them. As a result, it operates in a pincers between the giver’s desire for personal connection and the costs and constraints that imposes on business of serving poor people. In fact Kiva can be seen as an ingenious finessing of this old tension. Technology has brought down the cost of transmitting stories and images.

via cgdev.org

Though the cost of bringing these stories and photos back to sponsors has come down, it is still significant. Can we afford the photos and stories of entrepreneurs? How can we not afford them?

Hat tip to @tactphil for sharing the post.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (7)

Oct 13, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Kiva's Matt Flannery responds in a guest post on Roodman's blog http://blogs.cgdev.org/open_book/2009/10/matt-flannery-kiva-ceo-and-co-founder-replies.php
Oct 14, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Tim Ogden has this post linking to the major commentary on the Kiva situation. Quite a hot topic. http://www.philanthropyaction.com/nc/a_mostly_comprehensive_guide_to_the_kiva_and_donor_illusion_debate/
Oct 19, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Kiva has updated the explanation of its operations, and David Roodman now approves. Go openness! http://blogs.cgdev.org/open_book/2009/10/kiva-revamps-how-it-explains-itself-to-users.php
Oct 30, 2009
Laura Changala said...
We can all learn from mistakes like these. I think that it is best to take the positive spin. Surely we look not only to see the good that Kiva is doing but the good that those who took time to critique their marketing. 3rd party evaluation is the most efficient way to produce the best results.
Oct 31, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Absolutely right, Laura. And Kiva should be commended for the openness that gave 3rd parties enough info to work with. 

I do wonder about areas that 3rd party review doesn't see now. For example, David Roodman points out that Kiva does not reveal the interest that MFIs charge.  It's also odd that so many of Kiva's partners show a 0% default rate.    

Nov 03, 2009
Ben said...
Kiva actually does reveal the portfolio yield of its partners, a good proxy for the blended interest rate of its products, on its partner pages: http://www.kiva.org/about/aboutPartner?id=58
Nov 03, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Thanks, Ben. I stand corrected.

Interested rates are there -- with comparison to in-country peers and all Kiva.

Any idea why default so many of Kiva default rates show as 0? Perhaps
special arrangements Kiva makes -- as a large, transparent, funder,
Kiva may negotiate this?

But I'm speculating out of ignorance here. Anybody know?

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    Connect    twitter